[tweetmeme source="pricingright"]The usefulness of any customer metric depends on how actionable and how good a predictor of business success it is. Let us define here that business success refers to Sales growth and profitability.
- Of all the metrics out there, is there one that serves as a good predictor of sales growth and profitability?
- Can there be really a single metric?
- What do you, as a small business owner, an entrepreneur or a decision maker for large enterprise need to know about the single metric trap?
- What other factors you should be aware of?
Let us start with most common customer metrics, including but not limited to
- ACSI – Average Customer Satisfaction Index
- Top-2 Box (on a 5 point scale) Customer Satisfaction Score
- Number of recommendations – WoM, number of customers who actively recommend your product (service)
- Proportion of your customers complaining
- The Net Promoter Score
Supporters of some of the metrics claim theirs is the only metric any business need to track. In the data cited we will find a high positive correlation between these metrics and the two measures of business success. You do not need an advanced degree in statistics to question, “Does this correlation mean causation?”. But it does get a little tricky to sift through the data and flaws in analysis of the case for a single metric that predicts business success.
The biggest flaw that can occur in any argument that a single variable alone has predictive power is Omitted Variable Bias. Is there a lurking variable that was omitted in the model that drove both the metric and business success? This is not to say every argument that extends one predictor has Omitted Variable Bias but to raise the possibility that there may exist another variable that may explain the changes in your dependent variable.
Let me use an example to explain what it is before using it explain single metric trap.
This comes from Greg Mankiw. Suppose studies found a high correlation between test score of children and the number of bathrooms in their homes. Is this causation? Is this the single metric that determines success in tests? No. As Mankiw explains, the Omitted Variable here is the IQ of parents. It is possible that parents with high IQ earn high income and hence have large houses with more bathrooms. Their children may have high IQ because of the good genes passed on by their parents.
In the case of customer metrics, what could be the Omitted Variables? Some could be nature of products, your marketing strategy, channel strategy, nature of competition, etc. The question worth asking is, Is the metric at hand with high correlation same as the number of bathrooms at homes? Let us take the third metric above, Number of Recommendations, as an example just for illustrative purposes. Is it possible that the nature of customers you are targeting have a high propensity to recommend? If you did not consider this possibility then you will incorrectly align all your resources and actions towards improving number of recommendations without any impact on business goals.
That would result in house full of bathrooms but still poor test scores.
I am not recommending that you give up on all metrics but urge you to understand Omitted Variable Bias and consider the perils of tracking just one variable.
- What are all the different factors that are relevant to the business you are in and to your customers?
- How do these factors influence the single customer metric and your business success?
- After accounting for all these other variables, what percentage of changes in sales growth and profitability can be explained by the changes in that single customer metric you track?
In evidence based management any metric must be questioned for its predictive power and the methods by which the results are arrived at. Simplicity of a metric alone must not be the criteria.
Write to me, I will be happy to break this down more.
For a very readable and clear discussion of Omitted Variable Bias see also this post.